Monday, May 30, 2016

Outrage Over Killing Of Gorilla To Save 3 Year Old Boy, As Mother of the Three-year Old responds






The killing of a Gorilla at the Cincinnati Zoo after a 4-year-old boy tumbled into the ape's enclosure triggered outrage and questions about safety, but zoo officials called the decision to use lethal force a tough but necessary choice.

 More than 2,000 people signed a petition on Change.org that sharply criticized the Cincinnati Police Department and the zoo for putting down the animal and called for the child's parents to be "held accountable for their actions of not supervising their child."


Sponsored Link



Cincinnati police on Sunday said the parents had not been charged, but that charges could eventually be sought by the Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney. A spokeswoman for the prosecutor did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Authorities did not identify the child or his parents. The family could not be reached on Sunday.

A Facebook page titled "Justice for Harambe" had more than 3,000 likes by Sunday afternoon, a day after the 400-pound (181-kg) gorilla was shot dead about 10 minutes after encountering and dragging the child. The animal, named Harambe, was a Western lowland gorilla, an endangered species, and the zoo said it had intended to use him for breeding.

"If we think it's acceptable to kill a gorilla who has done nothing wrong, I don't think our city should have gorillas," Manvinder Singh posted on the Facebook page.

A blog post on the website for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals questioned why it was necessary to kill the gorilla and whether zoos could meet the needs of such animals.

"A 17-year-old gorilla named Harambe is dead, and a child is in the hospital. Why?" blogger Jennifer O'Connor wrote. "Western lowland gorillas are gentle animals. They don't attack unless they're provoked."

Witnesses told local television that the boy repeatedly expressed a desire to join the gorilla in the zoo habitat. "Mom mom, I wanna go to the water", the boy reportedly asked the mother. Moments later, the boy crawled through a barrier and fell about 12 feet (3.7-meters) into a moat surrounding the habitat, where Harambe grabbed him, zoo officials said. According to some eye-witnesses, Harambe was prompted by the screams of nearby tourists who witnessed the splash of water as the three-year child jumped into the water.

It was the first time in the 38-year history of the Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden's gorilla exhibit that an unauthorized person was able to get into the enclosure, zoo president Thane Maynard said on Saturday. It was not ascertained whether the gorilla was trying to protect the child as some animal rights supporters may have claimed, but it was obvious, according to Thanes Maynard that the life of the three-year old was in danger.

"They made a tough choice and they made the right choice because they saved that little boy's life," he said, adding that a member of the zoo's Dangerous Animal Response Team fired the shot that killed the gorilla, Harambe.

Maynard said the team decided to use deadly force instead of tranquilizers to subdue the gorilla because it could have taken some time for the drug to take effect when an animal was in "agitated" state.

The child was taken to Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center for treatment of non-life threatening injuries. Hospital officials, citing privacy laws, declined to say on Sunday whether the child had been released or to disclose any details about his injuries.

Justifying the killing of Harambe, Mr. Thanes Maynard, the Zoo Director, spoke Monday "that child life [was] in danger" questioning why some persons could question the killing. He said that the gorilla was "disoriented" and had the capability to fatally injure the child, although it was a "difficult call" to kill the Harambe.

In the press conference, he also praised the action of the response team, stating that he was "proud" of them, while the late Handsome Harambe "would be missed".

The parents of the little child had also released a statement informing the public about the safety of the child. They said that the "child is safe", but opted for some privacy. Mrs Michelle Gregg, the mother of the three year old however released a message through her Facebook page, thanking everyone for their support, and God for protecting the Child before his was rescued by the Dangerous Animal Response Team.

However, amidst some call for the prosecution of the parents of the three-year old, Mrs Michelle Gregg condemned such, citing that she had always been attentive to the well-being of her children, and branding the incident as an "accident". She further requested comments not to be "quick to judge".

In the meantime, a Facebook page has been created in support of the three-year old's mother: "I Support Michelle Gregg".


Western lowland gorilla numbers in the dense rain forests of Cameroon, the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Equatorial Guinea have declined by more than 60 percent over the last 20 to 25 years, according to the World Wildlife Federation.

The Cincinnati zoo was open on Sunday, although Gorilla World was expected to be closed indefinitely. Neither the zoo nor the fire department responded to a request for comment.

At other U.S. zoos, similar encounters have ended in tragedy, including the 2013 fatal mauling of a 2-year-old boy by a pack of wild African dogs after he fell into an exhibit at the Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium.

A man who in 2012 jumped into an enclosure at New York's Bronx Zoo to be "one with the tiger" suffered bite wounds and other injuries but survived.


But there was a happy ending when a 3-year-old boy fell into the gorilla den at Brookfield Zoo near Chicago in 1996, and an 8-year-old female gorilla named Binti Jua picked up the unconscious boy and protected him from the other primates. The act of kindness won Binti Jua national attention as Newsweek's Hero of the Year and one of People's most intriguing people.

There are more than a thousand signature call for the prosecution of the little child's parents for criminal negligence, although no charge yet.


No comments: